<label id="aihr5"></label>
    <thead id="aihr5"></thead>

      <thead id="aihr5"><optgroup id="aihr5"></optgroup></thead>
    1. <label id="aihr5"><meter id="aihr5"></meter></label>

        撥號18861759551

        你的位置:首頁 > 技術文章 > 光學畸變比較

        技術文章

        光學畸變比較

        技術文章

        Comparison of Optical Aberrations

        Optical aberrations are deviations from a perfect, mathematical model. It is important to note that they are not caused by any physical, optical, or mechanical flaws. Rather, they can be caused by the lens shape itself, or placement of optical elements within a system, due to the wave nature of light. Optical systems are typically designed using first order or paraxial optics in order to calculate image size and location. Paraxial optics does not take into account aberrations; it treats light as a ray, and therefore omits the wave phenomena that cause aberrations. For an introduction on optical aberrations, view Chromatic and Monochromatic Optical Aberrations.

         

        After defining the different groups and types of chromatic and monochromatic optical aberrations, the difficult part becomes recognizing them in a system, either through computer analysis or real-world observation, and then correcting the system to reduce the aberrations. Typically, optical designers first put a system into optical system design software, such as Zemax® or Code V®, to check the performance and aberrations of the system. It is important to note that after an optical component is made, aberrations can be recognized by observing the output of the system.

         

        Optically Identifying Aberrations

        Determining what aberrations are present in an optical system is not always an easy task, even when in the computer analysis stage, as commonly two or more aberrations are present in any given system. Optical designers use a variety of tools to recognize aberrations and try to correct for them, often including computer generated spot diagrams, wave fan diagrams, and ray fan diagrams. Spot diagrams illustrate how a single point of light would appear after being imaged through the system. Wave fan diagrams are plots of the wavefront relative to the flattened wavefront where a perfect wave would be flat along the x direction. Ray fan diagrams are plots of points of the ray fan versus pupil coordinates. The following menu illustrates representative wave fan and ray fan diagrams for tangential (vertical, y direction) and sagittal (horizontal, z direction) planes where H = 1 for each of the following aberrations: tilt (W111), defocus (W020), spherical (W040), coma (W131), astigmatism (W222), field curvature (W220), and distortion (W311). Simply select the aberration of interest to see each illustration.

         

        Aberration Name (Wavefront Coefficient):

        Recognizing aberrations, especially in the design stage, is the first step in correcting for them. Why does an optical designer want to correct for aberrations? The answer is to create a system that is diffraction limited, which is the best possible performance. Diffraction-limited systems have all aberrations contained within the Airy disk spot size, or the size of the diffraction pattern caused by a circular aperture (Figure 1).

         

        Equation 1 can be used to calculate the Airy disk spot size (d) where λ is the wavelength used in the system and f/# is the f-number of the system.

         

        OPTICAL ABERRATION EXAMPLES

        After a system is designed and manufactured, aberrations can be observed by imaging a point source, such as a laser, through the system to see how the single point appears on the image plane. Multiple aberrations can be present, but in general, the more similar the image looks to a spot, the fewer the aberrations; this is regardless of size, as the spot could be magnified by the system. The following seven examples illustrate the ray behavior if the corresponding aberration was the only one in the system, simulations of aberrated images using common test targets (Figures 2 - 4), and possible corrective actions to minimize the aberration.

         

        Simulations were created in Code V® and are exaggerated to better illustrate the induced aberration. It is important to note that the only aberrations discussed are first and third orders, due to their commonality, as correction of higher order aberrations becomes very complex for the slight improvement in image quality.

        Figure 2: Fixed Frequency Grid Distortion Target

         

        Figure 3: Negative Contrast 1951 USAF Resolution Target

         

        Figure 4: Star Target

         

        Tilt – W111

         

        Figure : Representation of Tilt Aberration

        Figure 5b: Simulation of Tilt Aberration

        Characterization

        Image Has Incorrect Magnification

        Caused by Actual Wavefront Being Tilted Relative to Reference Wavefront

        First Order: W111 = Hρcos (θ)

        Corrective Action

        Change System Magnification

         

        Defocus – W020

         

        Figure 6a: Representation of Defocus Aberration

        Figure 6b: Simulation of Defocus Aberration

        Characterization

        Image in Incorrect Image Plane

        Caused by Wrong Reference Image

        Used to Correct for Other Aberrations

        First Order: W020 = ρ2

        Corrective Action

        Refocus System, Find New Reference Image

         

        Spherical – W040

         

        Figure 7a: Representation of Spherical Aberration

        Figure 7b: Simulation of Spherical Aberration

        Characterization

        Image Appears Blurred, Rays from Edge Focus at Different Point than Rays from Center

        Occurs with all Spherical Optics

        On-Axis and Off-Axis Aberration

        Third Order: W040 = ρ4

        Corrective Action

        Counteract with Defocus

        Use Aspheric Lenses

        Lens Splitting

        Use Shape Factor of 1:PCX Lens

        High Index

         

        Coma – W131

         

        Figure 8a: Representation of Coma Aberration

        Figure 8b: Simulation of Coma Aberration

        Characterization

        Occurs When Magnification Changes with Respect to Location on the Image

        Two Types: Tangential (Vertical, Y Direction) and Sagittal (Horizontal, X Direction)

        Off-Axis Only

        Third Order: W131 = Hρ3;cos(θ)

        Corrective Action

        Use Spaced Doublet Lens with S in Center

         

        Astigmatism – W222

         

        Figure 9a: Representation of Astigmatism Aberration

        Figure 9b: Simulation of Astigmatism Aberration

        Characterization

        Causes Two Focus Points: One in the Horizontal (Sagittal) and the Other in the Vertical (Tangential) Direction

        Exit Pupil Appears Elliptical Off-Axis, Radius is Smaller in One direction

        Off-Axis Only

        Third Order: W222 = H2ρ2cos2(θ)

        Corrective Action

        Counteract with Defocus Use Spaced Doublet Lens with S in Center

         

        Field Curvature – W220

         

        Figure 10a: Representation of Field Curvature Aberration

        Figure 10b: Simulation of Field Curvature Aberrationn

        Characterization

        Image is Perfect, but Only on Curved Image Plane

        Caused by Power Distribution of Optic

        Off-Axis Only

        Third Order: W220 = H2 ρ2

        Corrective Action

        Use Spaced Doublet Lens

         

        Distortion – W311

         

        Figure 11a: Representation of Distortion Aberration

         

        Figure 11b: Simulation of Barrel Distortion Aberration

        Figure 11c: Simulation of Pincushion Distortion Aberration

        Characterization

        Quadratic Magnification Error, Points on Image Are Either Too Close or Too Far from the Center

        Positive Distortion is Called Barrel Distortion, Negative Called Pincushion Distortion

        Off-Axis Only

        Third Order: W311 = H3ρcos(θ)

        Corrective Action

        Decreased by Placing Aperture S in the Center of the System

         

        Recognizing optical aberrations is very important in correcting for them in an optical system, as the goal is to get the system to be diffraction limited. Optical and imaging systems can contain multiple combinations of aberrations, which can be classified as either chromatic or monochromatic. Correcting aberrations is best done in the design stage, where steps such as moving the aperture s or changing the type of optical lens can drastically reduce the number and severity (or magnitude) of aberrations. Overall, optical designers work to reduce first and third order aberrations primarily because reducing higher order aberrations adds significant complexity with only a slight improvement in image quality.

        聯系我們

        地址:江蘇省江陰市人民東路1091號1017室 傳真:0510-68836817 Email:sales@rympo.com
        24小時在線客服,為您服務!

        版權所有 © 2025 江陰韻翔光電技術有限公司 備案號:蘇ICP備16003332號-1 技術支持:化工儀器網 管理登陸 GoogleSitemap

        在線咨詢
        QQ客服
        QQ:17041053
        電話咨詢
        0510-68836815
        關注微信
        主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩亚洲人成在线综合日本| 亚洲精品第一国产综合境外资源 | 亚洲综合av永久无码精品一区二区| 亚洲狠狠色丁香婷婷综合| 国产在线五月综合婷婷| 激情97综合亚洲色婷婷五| 欧美伊香蕉久久综合类网站| 狠狠色狠狠色综合久久| 区三区激情福利综合中文字幕在线一区亚洲视频1| 欧美综合自拍亚洲综合图片区| 久久综合亚洲鲁鲁五月天| 99久久国产综合精品成人影院| 国产福利电影一区二区三区久久久久成人精品综合 | 色噜噜狠狠色综合日日| 国产天堂一区二区综合| 久久精品桃花综合| 97久久天天综合色天天综合色hd| 99久久婷婷免费国产综合精品| 久久婷婷激情综合色综合俺也去| 亚洲第一区欧美国产不卡综合| 亚洲 欧美 综合 高清 在线| 亚洲av日韩综合一区在线观看| 大香网伊人久久综合网2020| 亚洲欧洲国产成人综合在线观看 | 亚洲综合在线视频| 99精品国产综合久久久久五月天| 色综合欧美在线视频区| 婷婷亚洲综合五月天小说 | 国产色综合久久无码有码| 亚洲AV人无码综合在线观看| 亚洲AV综合色区无码另类小说 | 狠狠人妻久久久久久综合蜜桃| 狠狠色综合日日| 久久精品水蜜桃av综合天堂| 亚洲综合无码AV一区二区| 亚洲色婷婷综合久久| 国产91色综合久久免费分享| 91精品一区二区综合在线| 一本久久a久久精品综合香蕉 | 色综合中文字幕| 日韩综合在线观看|